THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PROMOTION MIX AND THE COMPANY'S BRAND IDENTITY WITH CUSTOMER SATISFACTION AT PT. INO WANGSA BINJAI

Authors

  • Budi Universitas Fajar image/svg+xml Author
  • Ivan Benedict Tambunan Akademi Pariwisata & Perhotelan Darma Agung Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65244/jggeconomic.v1i1.35

Keywords:

Mix Promotion, Brand Company, Satisfaction Buyer

Abstract

This study aims to deepen the understanding of the contribution of promotion and branding to increasing customer satisfaction at PT. Ino Wangsa Binjai. The study used primary data with a population of 300 buyers, and 75 respondents were selected as samples through calculations using the Slovin formula. The analysis techniques applied were quantitative, including validity tests, reliability, classical assumptions, simple linear regression, and hypothesis testing through t-tests and coefficients of determination (R²). Based on the analysis results, the promotional mix variable (E_Prmsi) obtained a t-count value of -1.824 with a significance level of 0.072 (> 0.05), while the t-table was 1.99346. Because the t-count is smaller than the t-table, it can be concluded that the promotional mix does not have a significant effect on customer satisfaction. In addition, a negative t-value indicates that the direction of the relationship between the promotional mix and customer satisfaction is not in line. Conversely, the partial test shows that the company's brand variable has a significant effect on customer satisfaction with a significance value of 0.00 (< 0.05). Therefore, the first hypothesis (H1) is declared accepted. From the results of the determination coefficient test, the R Square value is 0.495, which indicates that 49.5% of changes in customer satisfaction can be explained by the company's promotional mix and brand factors, while the remaining 50.5% is influenced by other variables not examined in this study. As a recommendation, the management of PT. Ino Wangsa Binjai, especially the branch manager, is advised to implement a more cost-effective, efficient, and targeted promotional strategy, as well as utilizing social media such as Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and print media such as newspapers to convey promotional information more effectively.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alma, 2013. Objective Promotion . (On line), ( https://repositori.buddhidharma.ac.id , accessible 21 April 2022)

Aris, 2017. Understanding Promotion . (On line), ( https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id , accessible 21 April 2022)

Ananda Aris 2013. Indicator Brand . (On line), ( https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id , accessible 21 April 2022)

Biel L Alexander And Aker A David, 2010. Indicator Brand . (On line), Jakarta : PT.

Index Group Gramedia.

Bob Sabran 2013. Indicator Brand . (On line), ( https://jom.universitassuryadarma.ac.id , accessible 21 April 2022)

Danang Sunyoto, 2015. Understanding Satisfaction Buyer . (On line), ( https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id , accessible 21 April 2022)

Donni June Priansa, 2017. Element Satisfaction Buyer . (On line), ( https://repository.stei.ac.id , accessible 21 April 2022)

Fitria 2016. Function Promotion . (On line), ( https://repository.bsi.ac.id , accessible 21 April 2022)

Ghozali, 2012. Application Analysis Multivariate with Program SPSS.

Semarang: Body Publisher University Diponegoro.

______, 2018. Test T Partial . (On line), Jakarta : PT.

Index Group Gramedia.

Kartajaya 2017. Understanding Brand (Brand) . (On line), ( https://e-journal.uajy.ac.id , accessible 21 April 2022)

Keller And Kotler, 2017. Understanding Brand . (On line), Jakarta : PT.

Index Group Gramedia.

_____________, 2017. Understanding Satisfaction Buyer . (On line), Jakarta : PT.

Index Group Gramedia.

Kotler, And Armstrong, 2016. Promotion Mix. Jakarta : PT.

Index Group Gramedia.

_______________________, 2014. Understanding Mix Promotion. Jakarta : PT.

Indeks Group Gramedia.

_______________, 2017. Understanding Brand . (On line), ( https://repository.bsi.ac.id , accessible 21 April 2022)

Malau 2017. Objective Main Promotion . (On line), ( https://repository.bsi.ac.id , accessible 21 April 2022)

Mc Hugh And Nickels 2015. Understanding Mix Promotion. Jakarta : PT.

Indeks Group Gramedia.

Nurdin And Hartati 2019. Definition Operational Variable. (On line), ( https://dspace.uc.ac.id , accessible 17 January 2023)

Oentoro, Deliyanti. 2010. Management Marketing Modern . Yogyakarta: Laksbang

Pressindo.

Peter And Olson 2014. Understanding Promotion Mix (Mix Promotion) . (On line), ( https://repository.ekuitas.ac.id , accessible 21 April 2022)

Rondowu And Komaling. 2017. Indicator Satisfaction Buyer. Jakarta : PT.

Index Group Gramedia.

Sheth, Howard 2014. Understanding Satisfaction Buyer . (On line), Jakarta : PT.

Indeks Group Gramedia.

Shimp 2010. Understanding Brand . (On line), ( https://www.kitapunya.net , accessible 21 April 2022)

Sugiyono, 2019. Method Study Quantitative, Qualitative, And R/D . Bandung: CV. Alphabet.

________, 2020. Definition Operational Variable . Bandung: CV. Alphabet.

________, 2019. Test Validity . (On line), Jakarta : PT.

Indeks Group Gramedia.

Swan, 2014. Understanding Satisfaction Buyer . (On line), Jakarta : PT.

Index Group Gramedia.

Tjiptono, 2014. Understanding Mix Promotion . (On line), ( https://repository.unpas.ac.id , accessible 21 April 2022)

_______, 2014. Objective Brand . (On line), ( https://eprints.kwikkiangie.ac.id , accessible 21 April 2022)

Tjiptono, Fandy, 2019. Marketing. Yogyakarta: Andi

_____________, 2014. Measurement Satisfaction Buyer . (On line), Jakarta : PT.

Indeks Group Gramedia.

Umar 2013. Formula Slovin . (On line), ( https://www.gramedia.com , accessible 21 April 2022)

Published

2025-08-11

How to Cite

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PROMOTION MIX AND THE COMPANY’S BRAND IDENTITY WITH CUSTOMER SATISFACTION AT PT. INO WANGSA BINJAI. (2025). Journal of Golden Generation Economic, 1(1), 48-59. https://doi.org/10.65244/jggeconomic.v1i1.35

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.